WTF is Sedition?

The last four years have had a lot of legal experts looking up once-obscure terminology. Emoluments, insurrection, sedition. These are not words I learned in law school. But, here we are. As 2020 drew to a close (I refuse to tarnish my brand-new 2021 with this garbage), it left us a spectacular and horrific parting gift: an armed takeover of the Capitol to prevent the certification of Joe Biden as President.

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

In layperson’s terms — this publication’s specialty — you’re not allowed to plan with another person to overthrow the government, or to use force to oppose its authority, or stop it from doing what it’s legally supposed to do, or seize its property.

Just so you know (I didn’t before today!), “treason” is a separate thing and is part of Article III of the Constitution. Treason requires the testimony of two witnesses or a confession in open court and, historically, was punished by a very painful death.

In Bryant v. U.S., the Fifth Circuit found a seditious conspiracy in the creation of a secret organization that sought to prevent citizens from being drafted during WWI, and they contemplated the possible overthrow of the government. The defendants in that case attempted to coerce others to join their cause and acquire guns and ammunition, but no violence ever occurred. More strikingly, in the case of Wells v. United States, the court found seditious conspiracy where the defendants published pamphlets calling for people to “resist” and “refuse” to be conscripted. There was no violence, just the printing of the word “resist,” which the court to imply that they would use force if they felt it necessary. According to the court, that was all the statute required. And, just so you don’t fall down that rabbit hole, the Supreme Court has already held that the law criminalizing seditious conspiracy does not violate freedom of expression.

Look, I really don’t want to get into the definition of “speech” today, and thankfully I don’t have to. Because, as the Supreme Court has noted, section 2384 doesn’t outlaw the speech itself but the effects of it. It’s not against the law to criticize the government or say you think Trump was the real victor of the 2020 election (he wasn’t), but it is against the law to conspire to overthrow the government or oppose its authority by force. Like any criminal conspiracy, at a certain point the speech becomes more than just expression, it becomes a criminal act.

This is a clear case of conspiracy to commit sedition by the people who stormed the Capitol. They planned to and did use force to attempt to stop Congress from carrying out its duties. But can Trump be roped into this conspiracy? He was hiding in the White House at the time, but are his words to his followers enough for incitement or a conspiracy?

Related posts:

You are given an integer array of prices where prices[i] is the price of a given stock on an ith day. Design an algorithm to find the maximum profit. The problem is to find out the maximum profit you…

Every time I went to a party in university and told someone that I studied psychology, at least one person would ask me, “So you can read minds?” Unfortunately, no. Still, there’s a lot of really…